Suicide bereavement is associated with elevated psychological and social burden among family members and relatives. This study aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the lived experiences and perceived support needs of suicide-bereaved family members and relatives. A qualitative systematic review and quote-based thematic meta-synthesis was conducted. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were primary qualitative research published in English involving family members/relatives bereaved by suicide. Methodological quality was appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and confidence in each synthesized finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. Verbatim participant quotations extracted from findings/results sections were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, guided by Doka’s disenfranchised grief as a sensitizing framework, with inductive coding for data not captured by the lens. Twenty-seven studies were included. Six cross-cutting themes described suicide bereavement as layered disenfranchisement: (1) stigma and anticipatory judgment prompting secrecy and withdrawal; (2) relational erasure through silence and loss of permission to name the deceased; (3) institutional non-recognition and lack of navigable postvention pathways; (4) moral injury and persistent culpability; (5) embodied, trauma-like distress and enduring existential suffering; and (6) legitimacy repair through peer support, compassionate witnessing, continuing bonds, and meaning-making. Synthesized support needs converged on stigma-competent and culturally safe care, permission-based communication, proactive coordinated pathways, trauma-informed long-term follow-up with attention to suicide risk, and accessible, tailored peer support. Suicide bereavement among family members is frequently shaped by social, relational, and institutional disenfranchisement, with important implications for designing proactive, culturally safe, and longitudinal postvention that addresses both symptom burden and social-ecological barriers. Keywords: Suicide bereavement; Disenfranchisedgrief; Qualitative meta-synthesis; Postvention; Family caregivers; Support needs

Suicide bereavement is associated with elevated psychological and social burden among family members and relatives. This study aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the lived experiences and perceived support needs of suicide-bereaved family members and relatives. A qualitative systematic review and quote-based thematic meta-synthesis was conducted. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were primary qualitative research published in English involving family members/relatives bereaved by suicide. Methodological quality was appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and confidence in each synthesized finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. Verbatim participant quotations extracted from findings/results sections were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, guided by Doka’s disenfranchised grief as a sensitizing framework, with inductive coding for data not captured by the lens. Twenty-seven studies were included. Six cross-cutting themes described suicide bereavement as layered disenfranchisement: (1) stigma and anticipatory judgment prompting secrecy and withdrawal; (2) relational erasure through silence and loss of permission to name the deceased; (3) institutional non-recognition and lack of navigable postvention pathways; (4) moral injury and persistent culpability; (5) embodied, trauma-like distress and enduring existential suffering; and (6) legitimacy repair through peer support, compassionate witnessing, continuing bonds, and meaning-making. Synthesized support needs converged on stigma-competent and culturally safe care, permission-based communication, proactive coordinated pathways, trauma-informed long-term follow-up with attention to suicide risk, and accessible, tailored peer support. Suicide bereavement among family members is frequently shaped by social, relational, and institutional disenfranchisement, with important implications for designing proactive, culturally safe, and longitudinal postvention that addresses both symptom burden and social-ecological barriers. Keywords: Suicide bereavement; Disenfranchisedgrief; Qualitative meta-synthesis; Postvention; Family caregivers; Support needs

Relational and Institutional Disenfranchisement in Suicide Bereavement: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Family Experiences

GUNDOGAN, SILA
2024/2025

Abstract

Suicide bereavement is associated with elevated psychological and social burden among family members and relatives. This study aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the lived experiences and perceived support needs of suicide-bereaved family members and relatives. A qualitative systematic review and quote-based thematic meta-synthesis was conducted. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were primary qualitative research published in English involving family members/relatives bereaved by suicide. Methodological quality was appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and confidence in each synthesized finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. Verbatim participant quotations extracted from findings/results sections were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, guided by Doka’s disenfranchised grief as a sensitizing framework, with inductive coding for data not captured by the lens. Twenty-seven studies were included. Six cross-cutting themes described suicide bereavement as layered disenfranchisement: (1) stigma and anticipatory judgment prompting secrecy and withdrawal; (2) relational erasure through silence and loss of permission to name the deceased; (3) institutional non-recognition and lack of navigable postvention pathways; (4) moral injury and persistent culpability; (5) embodied, trauma-like distress and enduring existential suffering; and (6) legitimacy repair through peer support, compassionate witnessing, continuing bonds, and meaning-making. Synthesized support needs converged on stigma-competent and culturally safe care, permission-based communication, proactive coordinated pathways, trauma-informed long-term follow-up with attention to suicide risk, and accessible, tailored peer support. Suicide bereavement among family members is frequently shaped by social, relational, and institutional disenfranchisement, with important implications for designing proactive, culturally safe, and longitudinal postvention that addresses both symptom burden and social-ecological barriers. Keywords: Suicide bereavement; Disenfranchisedgrief; Qualitative meta-synthesis; Postvention; Family caregivers; Support needs
2024
Relational and Institutional Disenfranchisement in Suicide Bereavement: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Family Experiences
Suicide bereavement is associated with elevated psychological and social burden among family members and relatives. This study aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the lived experiences and perceived support needs of suicide-bereaved family members and relatives. A qualitative systematic review and quote-based thematic meta-synthesis was conducted. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were primary qualitative research published in English involving family members/relatives bereaved by suicide. Methodological quality was appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and confidence in each synthesized finding was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. Verbatim participant quotations extracted from findings/results sections were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, guided by Doka’s disenfranchised grief as a sensitizing framework, with inductive coding for data not captured by the lens. Twenty-seven studies were included. Six cross-cutting themes described suicide bereavement as layered disenfranchisement: (1) stigma and anticipatory judgment prompting secrecy and withdrawal; (2) relational erasure through silence and loss of permission to name the deceased; (3) institutional non-recognition and lack of navigable postvention pathways; (4) moral injury and persistent culpability; (5) embodied, trauma-like distress and enduring existential suffering; and (6) legitimacy repair through peer support, compassionate witnessing, continuing bonds, and meaning-making. Synthesized support needs converged on stigma-competent and culturally safe care, permission-based communication, proactive coordinated pathways, trauma-informed long-term follow-up with attention to suicide risk, and accessible, tailored peer support. Suicide bereavement among family members is frequently shaped by social, relational, and institutional disenfranchisement, with important implications for designing proactive, culturally safe, and longitudinal postvention that addresses both symptom burden and social-ecological barriers. Keywords: Suicide bereavement; Disenfranchisedgrief; Qualitative meta-synthesis; Postvention; Family caregivers; Support needs
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FINAL Thesis_SILAGUNDOGANN_pdfA.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: A Meta-Synthesis of the Lived Experiences and Needs of Caregivers, Relatives, and Families Bereaved by Suicide
Dimensione 1.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.47 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

È consentito all'utente scaricare e condividere i documenti disponibili a testo pieno in UNITESI UNIPV nel rispetto della licenza Creative Commons del tipo CC BY NC ND.
Per maggiori informazioni e per verifiche sull'eventuale disponibilità del file scrivere a: unitesi@unipv.it.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14239/34120